top of page

ووطء الميتة يحتمل وجهين احدهما ينشر الحرمة لأنه معنى ينشر الحرمة المؤبدة فلم يختص بالحياة كالرضاع والثاني لا ينشرها وهو قول ابي حنيفة والشافعي لأنه ليس بسبب للبعضية ولأن التحريم يتعلق بإستيفاء منفعة الوطء والموت يبطل المنافع وأما الرضاع فيحرم لما يحصل به من إنبات اللحم وإنشاز العظم وهذا يحصل من لبن الميتة

المغني لإبن قدامة كتاب النكاح مسألة قال ووطء الحرام محرّم كما يحرم وطء الحلال والشُبهة

Intercourse with a dead woman carries two possible points of view. One of them is that it carries a prohibition, as the meaning is that it carries a continuous prohibition, since it is not characterized by life as is suckling. The second is that it does not carry a prohibition, and this is what Abu Hanifa and Al-Shafi’i said, since it is not for reasons of offspring, and since prohibition rests on obtaining something useful from the intercourse, and death annuls the usefulness. On the other hand, suckling establishes a kinship [i.e. forbidden] relationship when from it ensues generation of flesh and vivification of bones, and this ensues from the milk of a dead woman.

Ibn Qudama, Al-mughni [The Enricher], The book of marital relations, Issue: unlawful intercourse is prohibitive just as is lawful or dubious intercourse

bottom of page