top of page

وأما المالكيون فإنهم وافقونا على أن فعل قوم لوط ليس زنى وأن إتيان البهيمة ليس زنى فساووا بينهما في هذا الباب ثم انهم جعلوا في القذف بفعل قوم لوط حد القذف بالزنى ولم يجعلوا في القذف بإتيان البهيمة حد القذف بالزنى وهذا تناقض

المحلى لإبن حزم كتاب كتاب مسائل التعزير مسألة فيمن أتى بهيمة

Now then, those of the Maliki school – indeed they agree with us that the acts of the people of Lot [i.e. homosexual activity] are not adultery [zina], and that sex with animals is not adultery; they treat both as equal in this regard, then they assigned to an unfounded accusation of homosexual activity the same punishment as for unfounded accusation of adultery, but they did not assign to an unfounded accusation of sex with animals the punishment for unfounded accusation of adultery; and this is a discrepancy.

Ibn Hazm, Al-muhalla bi Al-athar [Sweetened by the Outcomes/Traditions], The book of matters of rebuke, Issue: regarding someone who has sex with an animal

bottom of page