top of page

قال أصحابنا والإعتبار في الجماع بتغييب الحشفة من صحيح الذكر بالاتفاق فإذا غيبها بكمالها تعلقت به جميع الأحكام ولا يشترط تغييب جميع الذكر بالاتفاق ولو غيب بعض الحشفة لا يتعلق به شيء من الأحكام بالاتفاق إلا وجهاً شاذاً ذكره بعض أصحابنا أن حكمه حكم جميعها وهذا الوجه غلط منكر متروك وأما إذا كان الذكر مقطوعاً فإن بقى منه دون الحشفة لم يتعلق به شيء من الأحكام وإن كان الباقي قدر الحشفة فحسب تعلقت الأحكام بتغييبه بكماله وإن كان زائداً على الحشفة ففيه وجهان مشهوراً لأصحابنا أصحهما أن الأحكام تتعلق بقدر الحشفة منه والثاني لا تيعلق شيء من الأحكام إلا بتغييب جميع الباقي والله أعلم

المنهاج في شرح صحيح مسلم للنووي كتاب الحيض باب بيان أن الجماع كان في أول الاسلام لا يوجب الغسل إلا أن ينزل المني وبيان نسخه وأن الغسل يجب بالجماع

Our companions have said that sex is considered as the disappearance of the head of a healthy penis, and this is agreed upon. If it is made to disappear completely, all the rulings for it are applicable, although it is agreed that this is not conditional upon the disappearance of the entire penis. If part of the head of the penis disappears, none of the rulings are applicable; this is agreed upon except for one perverse point of view which some of our companions have put forth – that all of the rulings are applicable – but this point of view is mistaken, repudiated, and abandoned. And if the penis is severed, and less than the equivalent of a head remains of it, none of the rulings are applicable as a result. If the remaining portion is equivalent to a head, the applicability of the rulings is deemed from its complete disappearance. And if there is more than what is equivalent to a head, there are two well-known points of view, the more correct of them being that the rulings are applicable due to the presence of what is equivalent to a head on it, and the second that none of the rulings are applicable except upon disappearance of the entire remaining portion. But Allah knows better.

Al-Nawawi, Al-minhaj fi Sharh Sahih Muslim [Open Path in Exposition of Sahih Muslim], The book of menstruation, Section: substantiating that in sex at the beginning of Islam, washing [ghusl] was not obligatory unless semen was discharged, and substantiating that this was abrogated and that washing is always obligatory from sex

bottom of page